Judging Criteria
Understanding our transparent and inclusive evaluation process
The Taji Awards employs a transparent, inclusive, and credible evaluation process that combines expert assessment with public participation, ensuring that every award reflects both professional excellence and community impact.
Awards Criteria
All nominees are evaluated using a structured framework based on the following key pillars:
Impact
Demonstrated positive and measurable contribution to society, industry, or community.
Innovation
Originality, creativity, and forward-thinking approaches that drive meaningful change.
Leadership
Vision, influence, integrity, accountability, and the ability to inspire others.
Sustainability
Long-term value, responsible practices, and enduring relevance.
Relevance & Reach
Significance and influence within the sector, region, or nationally.
Cultural & Social Significance
Alignment with Kenyan values, identity, and community needs.
Criteria weighting may vary slightly depending on category or regional context.
Judging & Public Voting Process
Nominations
Nominations are open to the public, institutions, industry bodies, and stakeholders through the official Taji Awards submission platform.
Screening & Verification
All submissions undergo a verification process to confirm eligibility, accuracy, and authenticity.
Independent Judges' Evaluation
A diverse and independent panel of judges—comprising industry experts, creatives, professionals, and thought leaders—evaluates all eligible nominations based on the published awards criteria.
Shortlisting
Nominees with the highest judges' scores are shortlisted per category and regional chapter.
Public Voting
Shortlisted nominees are opened to public voting, enabling communities and audiences to actively participate in the recognition process.
Public Voting Impact
- •Public support and engagement
- •Community relevance and resonance
- •Reach and influence